By PAUL ANDERSON
A federal judge in Santa Ana this week asked an attorney defending writer Chris Epting in a defamation lawsuit filed by former Minnesota Vikings punter Chris Kluwe what sanctions he thinks he deserves for misusing artificial intelligence in legal briefs.
“I don’t believe monetary sanctions are appropriate,” attorney William J. Becker Jr. told U.S. District Judge Fred Slaughter on Thursday, Oct. 23.
“So zero is the answer?” Slaughter replied.
“Zero is the answer,” Becker said.
Becker argued that the “humiliation” alone in being admonished for the misstep was punishment enough.
Slaughter said it was “unacceptable” to submit court briefs with fictitious cases for arguments on precedent.
“There’s no excuse for this,” Slaughter said.
Becker apologized for the misstep and said he was “fairly ashamed by it.”
Becker blamed it on a lack of resources for his nonprofit Freedom X Law.
“I failed my client,” he said. “I stand before you filled with humility.”
He said the work he submitted was “all done in haste,” because, “I have zero resources.”
He added that, “In this case, I’m up against a big, big law firm.”
Slaughter called AI a game of telephone, and added it was incumbent on attorneys to double check anything the tool yields with the original sources. The judge said he does not use artificial intelligence, adding, “I rely on me” and his personal research of the various laws and legal books as reference.
“I don’t make money as a nonprofit,” Becker said as he argued against financial sanctions.
Daniel Sasse, an attorney for Kluwe, said Becker submitted legal briefs citing “three cases that didn’t exist at all,” indicating Becker did not check the work produced by the artificial intelligence at all. Sasse said there were 22 examples of incorrect citations to legal precedence.
Slaughter also heard arguments from attorney Mark Bresee of the Huntington Beach Union High School District on a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, citing legal immunity.
Sasse argued that Kluwe was fired from his job as a coach at Edison High School following criticism from Epting and others on social media regarding Kluwe’s civil disobedience arrest at a Huntington Beach City Council meeting in February as a protest of a plaque at the city library in support of MAGA.
School officials cited a civility policy that Kluwe “had never seen,” Sasse said.
Kluwe’s attorney said that even though Kluwe was an at-will employee, he still had First Amendment rights.
Bresee said the school’s policy was one “you’ll see all over the state.”
“It appears the plaintiff has a long history of activism for civil rights issues for years,” Slaughter said of Kluwe’s speaking out, dating back to public support of legalizing same-sex marriage in 2012. And yet Edison officials did not discipline or fire him before this year, he noted.
Sasse said his client was told he was being fired because of the positions he was taking against Huntington Beach decisions. Epting is accused in the defamation suit of framing a social media post of the former punter’s as espousing violence, which Kluwe denied.
Bresee said the fact that Kluwe was never fired before due to his activism would show that he was discriminated against this year for exercising his free speech rights.
Bresee also argued that Kluwe was the one who went public with the reasons for his termination. Sasse argued Kluwe reposted Epting to make the case his statement was “false and defamatory.”
Slaughter said he would issue a ruling later.