Usa news

Jon Coupal: Will LA taxpayers be on the hook for Olympic costs?

A few weeks ago, it appeared that the city of Los Angeles might be liable for billions of dollars to backstop the costs of the upcoming 2028 Olympics. This very real threat to city taxpayers may have been alleviated to some degree with last week’s promise of more federal assistance, but many questions remain.

No one has been more relentless in pursuing answers to those questions than noted progressive civil rights attorney Connie Rice. She should be commended for her efforts to push the city to be more transparent about the costs to the city. This is especially true given that LA is effectively bankrupt and possesses a sorry history of incompetent governance.

On July 17th Rice sent a detailed letter to Mayor Karen Bass and other city leaders, concerning the “enhanced services agreement” between the City and LA28, the privately funded, non-profit organization created to oversee the games. Under an earlier agreement executed in 2021, LA28 would reimburse the city for services beyond what the city would provide on a normal day. These “enhanced services” — additional city services needed for the Games, beyond normal service levels, are projected to run into the hundreds of millions of dollars, if not more. And the pressure is on given that the final agreement has a deadline of October 1st of this year.

As Rice stated in her letter, “Los Angeles faces multiple fiscal hazards that many current leaders negotiating this and other Olympics agreements, will not be around to face.” She properly noted that, “The City cannot afford an additional $1.5 billion hit in 2028 because city officials inadequately protected taxpayers in 2025.”

Some of the more troubling concerns set for in Rice’s letter include what is the extent to which the city would have to pay the losses of other LA County venue cities. It should be noted that, due to fiscal unknowns, the City of Santa announced that it would not host a venue for the 2028 Olympics. That decision followed an October 2024 financial impact report that concluded Santa Monica would lose $1.45 million as a venue city, and after LA28 reportedly failed to offer sufficient financial guarantees to protect Santa Monica taxpayers.

The scope of “enhanced services” for which taxpayers have potential exposure is expansive. Rice’s letter specifically requested detailed information about:

While additional federal support could lessen the risk of LA taxpayers being stuck with the bill, it is unlikely to do anything to lessen the hostility between the Trump administration and city leaders. Taxpayers can only hope that both sides will work together to ensure a well-run Olympics. But if the negative reaction to Trump’s executive order is any indication, the 2028 games could easily turn into a chaotic mess the likes of which can only be imagined.

Jon Coupal is president of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. 

Exit mobile version