Student loan debt is a crushing problem in America. Over 44 million people have such loans, with an average balance of about $30,000 — making for a total debt pile of $1.4 trillion. Unsurprisingly, people often struggle to repay these debts with their entry-level wages after graduating. Student debt is now the most common form of troubled debt, with about 11 percent of them 90 days or more delinquent. Worse still, thanks to Republicans and neoliberal Democrats alike, they are almost impossible to discharge in bankruptcy.
We should try the most obvious solution: Congress should cancel all the debt and have the government pay back the lenders.
Perhaps that sounds radical and unworkable. But a new Levy Institute research paper by Scott Fullwiler, Stephanie Kelton, Catherine Ruetschlin, and Marshall Steinbaum demonstrates that it would be easily affordable and have powerfully positive side effects.
America’s student debt is a steadily growing share of all household debt, now a full 10 percent of the total. What’s more, that debt is heavily concentrated among young people, for obvious reasons. Since 1989, the average student loan debt held by families under 35 has increased by over 700 percent, from $1,810 to $14,516.
(Courtesy People’s Policy Project)
Canceling America’s $1.4 trillion in student loan debt would cost $140 billion per year for a decade. That’s about the cost of the recent Republican tax giveaway to the rich. But meanwhile, eradicating all student loan debt would cause GDP to go up between $86 billion and $108 billion per year, the researchers find. America would also see a burst of job creation — something like 1.2 million to 1.5 million jobs per year— and a reduction in the unemployment rate of 0.22 to 0.36 percentage points.
What’s behind those projections? It’s simple: Millions more people would be able to buy homes and cars, start families, and pump money into the economy that would otherwise have gone to debt collectors.
Undoubtedly, many unsympathetic reckless borrowers would benefit handsomely from such a policy. Conversely, people who have already paid off their loans might rightfully feel cheated. But remember, the burden of student loan debt falls the hardest on poorer and minority Americans. The top income quintile does have the largest absolute balances, but unlike in ages past, many middle- and working-class people now borrow heavily simply to attend a four-year or two-year public school. Such people may have smaller balances — but are much less able to repay. As a result, Latinos suffer from delinquent loans at higher rates than whites, and blacks much higher than Latinos. In this sense, debt cancellation would be a powerfully progressive move. Yes, plenty of rich people would benefit, and some people would feel shafted. But overall, this policy would help millions and millions of people. And there’s no sense in setting up some complicated means test when universal cancellation would be so much simpler and facially fair.
Now, you may ask, what happens after we wipe out all student loan debt? …read more
Source:: The Week – Politics