By TOM KRISHER
DETROIT — With a strike deadline looming, the group representing East and Gulf Coast ports is asking a federal agency to make the Longshoremen’s union come to the bargaining table to negotiate a new contract.
The U.S. Maritime Alliance says it filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board alleging that the International Longshoremen’s Association is not bargaining in good faith.
The alliance said in a prepared statement Thursday that it filed the charge “due to the ILA’s repeated refusal to come to the table and bargain on a new master contract.”
The ports are asking for immediate relief, an order requiring the union to resume bargaining.
In an email, the NLRB said it is investigating the complaint. It’s unlikely that the board would make a decision until well after the strike deadline. The NLRB says typically it takes seven to 14 weeks to decide on the merits of a charge.
The NLRB request comes just four days before the ILA’s six-year contract with the ports expires, and the union representing 45,000 dockworkers from Maine to Texas says it will go on strike at 12:01 a.m. on Tuesday.
FILE – In this photo provided by the Georgia Ports Authority, a vessel is loaded with containers by several ship to shore crane at the Georgia Ports Authority’s Port of Savannah Garden City Terminal, on Oct. 21, 2021, in Savannah, Ga. (Stephen B. Morton/Georgia Port Authority via AP, File)
The two sides haven’t bargained since June in a dispute largely over wages and a union-proposed ban on increased automation of port cranes, gates and trucks that could cost jobs.
“USMX has been clear that we value the work of the ILA and have great respect for its members,” the alliance statement said. “We have a shared history of working together and are committed to bargaining.”
The union called the NLRB filing “another publicity stunt” from the alliance and said the foreign-owned shipping companies it represents earn billions of dollars and take the money out of the U.S. The companies, it said in a release, “fail to adequately compensate the ILA longshore workforce for their labor.”
The ILA accused shipping companies that are part of the alliance of being unprepared for contract talks when the two sides met more than two years ago.
“USMX filing these charges four days before the expiration of the current master contract clearly illustrates what poor negotiating partners they have been,” the ILA said.
FILE – A container ship makes it way toward the Port of New York and New Jersey in Elizabeth, N.J., on June 30, 2021. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)
In early bargaining, industry analysts say the union sought 77% pay raises over six years to make up for inflation and give workers a chunk of the billions made by shipping companies since the coronavirus pandemic.
The union says both sides have communicated multiple times in recent weeks, but a stalemate remains because the Maritime Alliance is offering a pay increase that’s unacceptable.
Top-scale port workers now earn a base pay of $39 an hour, or just over $81,000 a year. But with overtime and other benefits, some can make in excess of $200,000 annually. Neither the union nor the ports would discuss pay levels. But a 2019-2020 report by the Waterfront Commission, which oversees New York Harbor, said about a third of the longshoremen based there made $200,000 or more.
The ILA has disputed claims it attributed to the alliance that the union’s demands amount to a wage increase of over 75% over the life of the contract.
FILE – Container ships are docked at the Port of New York and New Jersey in Elizabeth, N.J., on May 20, 2021. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, File)
“Deceiving the public with misleading calculations is not going to help get an agreement with the ILA,” President Harold Daggett said in the statement issued Monday.
The union has said shippers have made billions since the pandemic began. Copenhagen-based-Maersk, among the world’s largest container shipping companies, made more than $50 billion in profits over the past four years. Earnings, though, dropped substantially in 2023 as pandemic-era consumer demand eased and brought sky-high freight rates back down.
A strike would shut down as many as 36 ports that handle nearly half of the cargo going in and out of the U.S. on ships.
Related Articles
Postal workers are loving the new USPS delivery vehicle — and it’s not just the air conditioning
Bill separating warehouses from homes, schools passes California Legislature
Canadian union issues 72-hour strike warning to freight railroad hours after it resumes service
What’s it like inside Amazon’s San Bernardino air hub?
These photos show how Amazon’s San Bernardino air hub works
If a strike were resolved within a few weeks, consumers probably wouldn’t notice any major shortages of retail goods. Many retailers and other businesses have stocked up on goods in anticipation of a strike.
But a work stoppage that persists for more than a month would likely cause a shortage of some consumer products, although most holiday retail goods have already arrived from overseas.
A prolonged strike would almost certainly hurt the U.S. economy. Even a brief strike would cause disruptions. Heavier vehicular traffic would be likely at key points around the country as cargo was diverted to West Coast ports, where workers belong to a different union not involved in the strike. And once the longshoremen’s union eventually returned to work, a ship backlog would likely result. For every day of a port strike, experts say it takes four to six days to clear it up.
If a strike occurs, it would be the first national work stoppage by the ILA since 1977.