In the frenetic early months of Donald Trump’s second presidency — foreign policy reversals, tariff shocks, immigration controversies, Department of Government Efficiency’s bureaucratic assaults and a plethora of legally dubious executive orders — there’s been no shortage of criticism.
In legacy and mainstream newsrooms, Trump’s unprecedented high-speed moves have been dissected, questioned and, in many cases, condemned.
But for a significant portion of his voter base, especially those tuned into right-wing TV, radio and social media, the criticism is little more than background noise, if it’s heard at all.
This isn’t an accident. It’s the result of a deeply entrenched, highly effective media ecosystem that acts more like an echo chamber than a news source. In our polarized political environment, the reality is many Trump supporters live in a soundproof bubble, where dissenting voices rarely penetrate and the narrative is tightly controlled.
To understand why Trump voters aren’t hearing the criticism, you first have to grasp the architecture of the conservative media landscape.
It’s a tightly woven web of TV networks like Fox News and Newsmax, radio juggernauts like Mark Levin and Dan Bongino and a proliferation of online platforms and social media influencers — Trump enforcer and X owner Elon Musk tops that list — that cater exclusively to right-wing audiences.
These outlets don’t just report the news, they shape it, filter it and, in many cases, reframe it to fit a specific ideological narrative.
When Trump signs a controversial executive order, like a nationwide migrant roundup or dramatic program cuts, mainstream media outlets highlight legal challenges, protests and constitutional concerns. But in the right-wing media bubble, the story is about protecting American borders and fulfilling campaign promises.
Every executive order, no matter how controversial, is framed as a bold move against the corrupt left-wing establishment. Every policy decision is portrayed as a win for “real Americans” against the so-called liberal elites.
When criticism does seep in, it’s immediately framed as part of a broader conspiracy to undermine the president and his supporters.
This isn’t just selective reporting, it’s narrative control. Criticism from outside the bubble is dismissed as “fake news,” a term Trump himself weaponized to discredit unfavorable coverage.
It’s a brilliant if dangerous strategy, because by undermining trust in traditional media, Trump and his allies have effectively insulated themselves from accountability, creating a feedback loop where supporters are only exposed to information that reinforces their beliefs.
If right-wing TV and radio are the pillars of the conservative media ecosystem, social media is the glue that holds it all together. Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X — formerly known as Twitter — are designed to amplify content that gets the most engagement, which often means the most sensational, emotionally charged and polarizing content rises to the top.
In addition, social media has democratized misinformation. It’s no longer just about what Fox News reports or what Sean Hannity says on the radio. Now, anyone with a smartphone can spread half-truths, conspiracy theories and outright lies to a global audience. And when these falsehoods are shared by friends and family, they carry even more weight, making it even harder for criticism to break through.
When half the country is living in one reality and the other half in another, finding common ground becomes nearly impossible. Political disagreements turn into cultural wars, and compromise becomes a dirty word.
A healthy democracy relies on an informed electorate exposed to a variety of viewpoints and willing to engage. When large segments of the population are shielded from criticism and fed a steady diet of propaganda, the very foundations of our democratic system are at risk.
So, what’s the solution? How do you reach people who are cocooned in a media bubble that’s designed to keep criticism out?
One step is to acknowledge that facts alone aren’t enough. You can’t just bombard Trump supporters with evidence and expect them to change their minds. The media bubble is fortified not just by misinformation, but by identity and emotion. For many Trump voters, supporting him isn’t just a political choice; it’s part of who they are.
Critics need to find ways to connect on a human level — town hall meetings and other bipartisan gatherings are a good start — to build trust and foster dialogue. That means listening as much as talking, finding common ground where possible and being patient.
Change won’t happen overnight, but the more we engage across ideological divides, the better chance we have of piercing the bubble.
Meanwhile, it’s important to recognize the power of the conservative media ecosystem and the role it plays in shaping perceptions. Until that bubble bursts — or at least loses air — the criticism of Trump’s orders, policies and actions will continue to fall on deaf ears. And that’s one reality we can’t afford to ignore.
Andy Shaw is a semiretired journalist and good government reform advocate.
The views and opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Chicago Sun-Times or any of its affiliates.
The Sun-Times welcomes letters to the editor and op-eds. See our guidelines.