Southampton will not play in the Championship play-off final after losing their appeal against their punishment over the Spygate scandal.
The Saints had booked their place at Wembley after beating Middlesbrough in the semi-finals, but were thrown out after admitting to spying on their opponent’s training session.
The club also admitted spying on opponents before two other Championship games earlier in the season.
As a result Southampton were thrown out of the play-offs, replaced by Middlesbrough in the final, and deducted four points for the start of next season.
Love football?
Our seven-day guide to the World Cup is live. 48 teams, 104 games, 1104 players – we’ve got everything you need to know. Sign up now.
The club appealed, but on Wednesday that appeal was dismissed, with the EFL stating: ‘A League Arbitration Panel has tonight dismissed Southampton Football Club’s appeal against the Independent Disciplinary Commissions’ sanction following the admittance of multiple breaches of EFL Regulations.
‘The determination means that the original sanction of expulsion from the Sky Bet Championship Play-Offs remains in place, as does the four-pint deduction to be applied to the 2026/27 Championship table and the reprimand in respect of all charges.’
The Saints have not taken it entirely graciously, insisting that the punishment is too heavy, while claiming they will ‘respond with humility, accountability and determination to put things right.’
A club statement read: ‘Southampton Football Club has this evening been informed that the EFL’s League Arbitration Panel has upheld the sanctions imposed earlier this week. As a result, the club will not participate in Saturday’s Championship Play-Off Final.
‘This is an extremely disappointing outcome for everybody connected with Southampton Football Club. We know how painful this moment will be for our supporters, players, staff, commercial partners and the wider community who have given so much backing to the team throughout the season and we apologise once again to everyone impacted by this.
‘While we fully acknowledge the seriousness of this matter and the scrutiny that has followed, the club has consistently believed the original sporting sanction was disproportionate, a view that has been widely shared by many in the football community over the last 24 hours.
‘We would like to place on record our sincere thanks to our supporters for the support, patience and loyalty they have shown throughout an incredibly difficult period. We will share information as soon as possible in relation to ticket refunds for those who bought tickets to Wembley.
‘Southampton Football Club has a proud history and strong foundations, but it is clear that trust now needs to be rebuilt. That work begins immediately. The club will reflect carefully on the events that have led to this point, learn from them and take the necessary steps to move forward responsibly.
‘While tonight is a painful moment, this football club will respond with humility, accountability and determination to put things right.’
Ahead of the appeal Southampton chief executive Phil Parsons set out their claims, explaining: ‘On the appeal itself: we accept that there should be a sanction. What we cannot accept is a sanction which bears no proportion to the offence. Whereas Leeds United was fined £200,000 for a similar offence, Southampton has been denied the opportunity to compete in a game worth more than £200 million and one which means so much to our staff, players and supporters.
‘We believe the financial consequence of yesterday’s ruling makes it, by a very considerable distance, the largest penalty ever imposed on an English football club. Luton Town’s 30-point deduction in 2008/09 — to date the most severe sporting sanction in the English game — was levied against a club already in League Two, with no comparable revenue at stake. Derby County’s 21-point deduction in 2021 cost them their Championship status. Everton’s eventual six-point deduction in 2023/24 followed losses of £124.5 million, a figure dwarfed by what has been taken from Southampton in a single afternoon. The largest financial penalty ever levied by the Premier League, against Chelsea in March of this year, was £10.75 million, and was accompanied by no sporting sanction whatsoever despite involving £47.5 million in undisclosed payments over seven years.
‘We say this not to minimise what occurred at this club, which we have accepted was wrong. We say it because proportionality is itself a principle of natural justice. The Commission was entitled to impose a sanction. It was not, we will argue, entitled to impose one that is manifestly disproportionate to every previous sanction in the history of the English game.’